Glean vs Sinequa

Pricing and features verified Aug 13, 2026

SOC 2ISO 27001
Key clients
Booking.comZillowTIMEEricssonGCash
Key clients
CumminsAlstomUCBSiemensAtos
The short version

Glean wins for most organizations looking to connect standard workplace apps with multi-LLM support and built-in cost optimization. The tradeoff is Sinequa offers deeper data scale, with over 200 enterprise connectors and automated content enrichment for complex document environments.

Pricing

Glean

Does not publish pricing.

Sinequa

Does not publish pricing.

Key features

Glean
  • Enterprise Context & SearchConnects knowledge and systems across apps, meetings, and documents to deliver contextual, reliable answers.Source
  • AI Agents & AutomationEnables teams to build tailored AI agents using natural language to automate workflows and move work forward.Source
Sinequa
  • Enterprise Agentic AIDeploy intelligent multi-agent systems that plan, collaborate, and execute automated workflows grounded in trusted internal data.Source
  • Assistive AIEmpower employees with enterprise AI assistants that answer complex questions and make internal information actionable.Source

Company

DetailGleanSinequa
Founded20192002
Based inPalo Alto, USAParis, France
OwnershipPrivatePrivate
Total raised$620M
Latest roundSeries E · 2024Series B · 2019
BackersKleiner Perkins, Lightspeed Venture Partners, Sequoia Capital, General Catalyst, DST Global, Altimeter Capital, Coatue, IVPJolt Capital, Bpifrance

Which should you choose?

Choose Glean if

you need automatic content enrichment and over 200 connectors to index complex enterprise data sources.

Choose Sinequa if

you need permission-aware search across core workplace tools with multi-LLM flexibility and token cost controls.

Frequently asked questions

What are the main feature differences between Sinequa and Glean?
Sinequa provides automatic content enrichment, a no-code assistant builder, and over 200 data connectors. Glean includes multi-LLM model flexibility, token and cost optimization, query observability, and integrations for tools like Slack, Jira, GitHub, and Salesforce.
How do Sinequa and Glean handle enterprise security and permissions?
Sinequa enforces document-level security while grounding AI agents in proprietary data to eliminate hallucinations. Glean applies permission-aware access controls to ensure users only view authorized data and tracks queries and actions for compliance governance.
How do the two platforms approach building AI agents?
Sinequa offers a no-code assistant builder to orchestrate multi-agent systems that plan and execute automated workflows. Glean enables teams to create tailored AI agents using natural language to automate tasks across workplace apps.
What integration options do Sinequa and Glean provide?
Sinequa connects across data sources and documents using more than 200 connectors. Glean provides deep integrations with core workplace tools including Slack, Google Drive, Jira, Confluence, SharePoint, GitHub, and Salesforce.
How does pricing compare between Sinequa and Glean?
Both platforms offer self-serve access and do not require annual-only contracts. Specific pricing tier amounts are not publicly listed in the provided specifications.